In religion, symbolism is used to denote sacred ideas.
Every religion has a series of symbolic representations, of various forms.
There's: the lotus in
Buddhism and the eight-spoke wheel of life, the "om"
symbol in Hinduism, the essential cross
of Christianity, and then there is the importance of the Jewish Star of David, and a vast range
of others. But why? What is the point of a religious symbol to represent certain
things? Why do we do this, instead of expressing ideas not in a symbolic
fashion, and using simply the words themselves and just text?
The answer is: because these items carry deep meaning.
It goes beyond the image itself, but is a means of communication. The idea that
a symbol is communicating, is therein where the depth of meaning lies and what
carries the power of the image. The author James C. Livingston describes it as
"...a necessary bridge erected between the finite and "the Something
More."
The finite,
meaning "the having of bounds." This is the main reason why we should
not disregard these symbols as "silly" in any way, or assume that
they will ever lose their true meanings. They will not, as the ideas that they
correspond to are very deeply rooted values. They can also be, at times, a
representational symbol of an event which occurred in the history of a religion
to establish its way of life and its foundational philosophy. They are here to
stay for an eternity, as the ideas they connect to are not fleeting in any way.
Each religious symbol is worthy of a great deal of
respect. Tradition goes beyond and far exceeds a simple "popularity,"
especially in the case of religious value. Religious symbolism can be found as
a bumper sticker on someone's truck, or as a tattoo on someone's ankle, but
these are symbolic representations that have been founded and developed over
time based on a true belief in something, and these images are capable of
communicating things that might otherwise be difficult to state in ordinary words.
What
religions attempt to approach may be considered beyond human utterance.
Believers build statues and buildings through which to worship the divine, but
these forms are not the divine itself. Because people are addressing the
invisible, it can be suggested only through metaphor. Deepest consciousness
cannot speak the language of everyday life; what it knows can be suggested only
in symbols- images borrowed from the material world that are similar to ineffable spiritual experiences.
(Fisher)
Sarah
Works Cited
Fisher,
Mary Pat. Living Religions. Upper
Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2011. Print.
Livingston, James C. Anatomy of The Sacred:
An Introduction to Religion. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall,
2009. Print.
"Symbolism." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 28 Jan. 2013. Web. 06 Feb. 2013.
I really enjoyed this piece, and your variety of sources. But I challenge you to update the part where you use Wikipedia. You note that "one of the authors" and there were probably hundreds on the symbolism page. Wikipedia is fine for personal interest, but it's notoriously open to edit by anybody with an account. So...not so scholarly because of the anonymous nature of the site and the constant changing of content. You have other excellent sources...keep with them.
ReplyDeleteI like that last quote you used by fisher where it says "Deepest consciousness cannot speak the language of everyday life; what it knows can be suggested only in symbols". Sometimes certain things just cannot be expressed through words, however if there is a symbol for something it can hold deeper meanings. Even he stories in the bible are symbols of how people should be living their lives, Jesus is a symbol of ourselves and what we should aspire to be
ReplyDelete