I find religions
fascinating. Personally and intellectually, I feel that this is the most relevant,
and helpful topic to me right now. Although I have other interests, religion is
so fruitfully diverse, and with so many wide-ranging sectors within each, I
believe that it makes for some immensely intriguing writing pieces. Reading a
multitude of religious writings has, and will continue to help me formulate my
own opinions about my faith and my personal truth. I know that it does for many others as well. You might be
surprised the personal growth that can come from looking into the outlooks of
others. I know I was. I was
certainly pretty shocked by this when I showed up for a religion course. I
realized immediately just how interesting religion can be.
As humans, we are
all too conscious of those things that challenge and threaten to destroy our
deepest commitments and values-things such as moral failure, tragedy,
inexplicable evil, and death itself. These realities can fill us with dread and
terror, in part because they lie outside our ability to control. The
sociologist Thomas O’Dea has spoken of religion as a response to three
fundamental features of human existence: uncertainty, powerlessness, and
scarcity. Religion is rooted, certainly, in a wider range of human experience
and emotion than these, including such positive experiences as wonder, trust,
love, and joy. But O’Dea is correct as far as he goes. The brute facts of our
existence do bring us face to face with questions about which our normal
practical techniques and scientific know-how are powerless to provide answers
or solutions. (Livingston)
In terms of how I intend to talk about religion, I want everyone to know that I will go about
this blog with this rationale in mind: I hope that along the way I will squash
a few judgements that others might maintain about certain practices, or people.
While that isn’t necessarily my main objective, I feel that in order to be
respected in an academic community, one must be open-minded and go about their
critiques with as much finesse as possible. It is especially important to go
about writing about religions, and having discussions about them with a great
deal of consideration, as these are other people’s faiths. Faiths, which they
feel very strongly about, and with which they are extremely connected to
personally.
During the course
of this blog, I may have posts in which the topic leans more toward talking
about Zen Buddhism than other topics. That is simply because last year I went
to a Buddhist temple in the area and meditated. Before I meditated, I expected
that I would not be able to achieve the results that others described so
vividly, but instead fall asleep, or tear from overwhelming stress. After I
experienced it for myself, I realized that I felt a deep sort of relief, as if
a weight had been lifted off my shoulders. Another reason why I might pursue
writing about my experience pursuing a deeper understanding of Zen Buddhism
more than other topics within different religions, is because I am very
intrigued by the idea that if you can change your mind, then you can change
your life.
Sarah
Works Cited:
Livingston, James C. Anatomy of The Sacred:
An Introduction to Religion. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall,
2009. Print.
This was an excellent and introspective first post. But I wonder: do you really think you can "squash" people's perceptions (or misperceptions) about religion? If you can, you should run for world president! Because isn't this at the heart of what most of our conflict is from?
ReplyDeleteOne other small note: can you bump up the font one size? You have great things to say already, but this font is quite small...